Monday Open Thread: TV or not TV?

Happy Monday everyone!

Let’s talk TV. Not what’s on TV, but what you do– or don’t do– in front of it.

Do you have a TV in the bedroom? DH said he heard some discussion on the radio recently that in order to keep the sex life humming, you should keep the TV out of your bedroom.

Meh, I said. We love TV. We have always had a TV in the bedroom, through our passionate early years to the sleepless nights when I watched infomercials while nursing an infant. If we want some action, it’s easy enough to turn the damn thing off.

What drives DH crazy is my tendency to fall asleep while watching TV, usually some true crime show on the ID Channel. He wakes in the middle of the night to some bloody scene and has to find the remote and turn it off.

And while we’re on the topic: what about TVs in the kids’ bedrooms? Maya recently had a playdate and saw that her classmate has a TV and DVD player in her bedroom. Much begging for her own TV followed. Um, no. Not gonna happen.

Where do you stand on the topic of TVs?

What else is on your mind today?

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+PrintBlogger PostStumbleUponShare

So, do you use “marital aides”?

Yeah, ladies I am going there! We sort of started taking about it in the open thread, but let’s get down to brass tacks, do you use them, do you like them, do you have any tips or hints or products you would like to share.

I will go first and get the REALLY embarrassing stuff out of the way. The other week I hurt my labia somehow or another, I mean I actually had a small cut or abrasion or something. So I took a week off from activity, put some neosporin on it, and tried to keep things, ahem, dry and airy and what not. When I decided to resume activity I was sure to use some lubricant because I sure as hell did not want any injury or aggravation. Here’s where it gets weird…


I got the most awful irritation in that area afterward! I was like, “WHAT IN THE HELL?” because frankly none of my activity had been that acrobatic or super prolonged; so what was going on? I did some research and come to find out the lubricant I was using contains glycerin and propylene glycol which are apparently sugars and can contribute to yeast infections. Yeah. The stuff I was using to make sure I wasn’t hurting myself was actually hurting me.

So I found three brands that do not contain glycerin, Pjur, Sliquid, and Slippery Stuff. Some even come in a paraben-free version, which frankly surprised me. I knew to look out for parabens in sunscreen but had not realized they were used in personal lubricants as well. I am sure there are others out there, but these were all major brands that seemed readily available.

So my next question about water based lube was why does it seem to get sticky after awhile? Turns out you can basically “rehydrate” the stuff with some water, pouring on more lube will actually make it worse. One place recommended keeping a little spray bottle next to the bed for just such an occasion and that made me laugh out loud. Aiming a spray bottle at someone’s genitals like you were disciplining a cat! I assumed a little saliva on the area would work as well? Anyhow!

My favorite (and only) toy up and died on me and I am now shopping for a new one. I’d had the other one for a number of years and we’d bonded. I may have had a small service for my old toy, buried it in the backyard, played Taps, quietly.

I saw that the Lelo line of personal massagers had introduced a new line calledLuxe. However I am not the type to spend href=”800 dollars on a personal massager, no matter if it is made out of 18K gold. For that price it better also vacuum the floor and make julienne fries. A more economical option might be the Lucid Dream vibe, but it is specifically for g-spot stimulation. I am not sure I know where my g-spot is or if I even have one. Frankly I have never found my A-F spots either, so maybe I am not meant for this toy. I fancy theHitachi Magic Wand as I have had friends basically testify about them. It is also the number one most popular vibrator in the Good Vibrations catalogue, so there’s that.

Also, my 2 year old is all of a sudden OBSESSED with my side table drawer, something my 8 year old still seems to have NO interest in, so where am I going to keep something new? Anyone got a good hiding spot for me?

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+PrintBlogger PostStumbleUponShare

Survey Says: Two Surveys of Teen Sex Can Help Parents Gain Perspective and Start Conversations

This story was originally published on Advocates for Youth’s Birds and Bees Blog.

In June, as teens across the country were trading in their backpacks and books for bathing suits and beach towels, two different divisions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released surveys on teens’ sexual behavior. These surveys, which are conducted at regular intervals, provide a snapshot of what today’s teens are doing and a way of tracking trends over time.

The first of the studies, the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Summaries (YRBS) conducted by the CDC’s Division of Adolescent and School Health (DASH), surveys high school students every two years. The results released last month were from the 2009 survey; it found that 46% of all high school students report ever having had sexual intercourse.

The second study, released by the National Center for Health Statistics, is a report on teens 15–19 who participated in the most recent National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). The NSFG surveys women and men ages 15–44 and asks questions regarding “family life, marriage and divorce, pregnancy, infertility, use of contraception, and men’s and women’s health.“ The report, Teenagers in the United States: Sexual Activity, Contraceptive Use, and Childbearing, National Survey of Family Growth 2006–2008, is among the first bits of data to be released from the most current survey. This study found that 42% of never-married females and 43% of never-married males ages 15–19 reported having ever had sexual intercourse.

Educators and public health professionals rely on these surveys to plan programs aimed at preventing both pregnancy and STDs, including HIV. And, though as parents, we obviously care more about a few select teens than the “cohort“ as a group, I think these surveys include some interesting information for us as well.

Misperceptions About Teen Sex

I believe that adults, with a great deal of help from the media (both in the form of news stories about  rampant teen oral sex and television shows like Gossip Girl that make teen sex seem, well, rampant), tend to overestimate and catastrophize when it comes to this subject.  Some of the information in these surveys can actually correct misperceptions about teen sex and as such should be reassuring to parents.

It’s Not the Youngest Ones

One of the problems when we talk about teen sex is that our minds automatically turn to the youngest of teenagers; those 13 and 14 year olds whose playground days are not far behind. I would venture to guess that most, if not all, adults agree that these teens are too young to be having sex.


The good news is that, for the most part, 13 and 14 year olds are not having sex; according to the YRBS, 6% of high school students report having had sex before age 13. Not surprisingly, the percentage of teens who have had sex goes up steadily with age. If you look at the YRBS, this number jumps from 32% of ninth graders to 62% of high school seniors. Similarly, the NSFG found that among never-married males only 29% of those 15–17 had had sex compared to 65% of those ages 18 and 19. Among never-married females, 28% of those 15–17 had ever had sex compared to 60% of those 18 and 19.  

Not everyone agrees that pre-marital sex is okay at any age, but I think few people find it alarming when 19 year olds, many of whom are in college or living on their own under other circumstances, are having sex. So, perhaps we can look at these data and take a deep breath knowing we are talking mainly about the behavior of older (and with our help wiser) teens.

Virgin/Slut Myth

Our society likes to categorize people, women in particular, as either pure and saintly or slutty and promiscuous.  While used on adults as well, this image is even stronger when it comes to young people. In our minds and our media, there seem to be either responsible, studious young people with hopeful futures who remain abstinent or their less virtuous peers who lose their virginity in high school and proceed to hop into bed with any and everyone they meet.  

Well, it turns out that sexually active teens really aren’t boffing like irresponsible bunnies. They are doing what many single adults do: entering into a small number of selective sexual relationships. Both the YRBS and the NSFG found that only about 14% of young people had had more than 4 partners in their lifetime. Among never-married, teen males and females, 2 partners was most likely according to the NSFG. And, as much as we hear about hook-up culture, it is not true that teen sex is all about friends with benefits and one night stands.  In fact, according to the NSFG the most common first sexual partner (for 72% of females and 56% of males) is someone with whom they were “going steady.“

We should also note that while many teens are sexually experienced far fewer remain continuously sexually active. The YRBS found that only 34% of high school students had had sex in the three months prior to the survey. And, the NSFG found that of those never-married teens who had ever had sex only 38% (of males and females) had done so in the last year and only 28% of males and 30% of females had done so in the last three months.  

As parents we should be pleased with the idea that sexually active teens, like adults, are being selective about when and with whom they choose to have sex.

Contraceptive Use

When it comes to responsible sexual behavior, one of the most telling signs is contraceptive use, and though there is certainly room for improvement, the statistics show us that sexually experienced teens are capable of protecting themselves against pregnancy and STDs.

The NSFG found that 95% of sexually experienced, never-married teens had used a condom at least once and that the majority of them (79%) used a contraceptive method the first time they had sex. The YRBS asked sexually active teens (which it defines as those who had sex in the 3 months prior to the survey) if they used condoms the last time they had sex and 61% of them said they had.  Similarly, the NSFG found that among those never-married teens who had had sex within the month prior to the survey 51% of females and 71% of males used condoms 100% of the time. (Obviously, we’d want that number to be 100% for all, but 71% of teen males using condoms every time they had sex is pretty impressive and definitely flies in the face of the irresponsible “boys will be boys“ image that comes to mind when we think of teen guys and sex.)

Looking at the facts from these surveys (rather than inaccurate perceptions of what teens are doing) suggests that it’s time to stop telling our young people that they are too immature and irresponsible to understand or engage in sexual activity, give them some credit for what they are doing right, and help them improve those behaviors that still place them at risk.  

But What Are They Thinking?

While these surveys are useful, especially from a public health perspective, they focus almost exclusively on, as a colleague of mine once said, who put what where and how often. I have always hoped the CDC and other agencies would use the opportunities they have to question young people, to ask not just about what they are doing but also about they are thinking. The NSFG does ask a handful of these questions.  
For example, the NSFG asks sexually experienced teens how they felt about the first time they had sex.  Most never-married, females (47%) said they had mixed feelings about the first time they had sex “part of me wanted it to happen at the time and part of me didn’t“ though a similar number (43%) said they “really wanted it to happen at the time.“ Not surprisingly, the older a teen was when she first had sex, the more likely she was to say she really wanted it to happen. And, though never-married, teen males  were more likely to report they “really wanted it to happen“ (62%), the same trend holds true for guys; those who waited until they were at least 15–17 were more likely to say this.

As a parent, I think this information is incredibly valuable. Regardless of our own personal opinions about under what circumstances (long-term relationship, marriage) and at what age (16, 19, 21) it’s okay for our kids to have sex, I’m pretty sure we all want them to wait until the right experience (the one that they “really wanted to happen at the time“) comes along. Knowing that this is often not the case among their peers can help us talk to our own kids about what makes sexual relationships special and how they should wait for that.

Other questions provide insight on condom and contraceptive use. While the good news is that among those never-married teens who had had sex in the 3 months prior to the survey, 96% of females and 86% of males felt there was a “pretty good or almost certain chance“ that they or their new partner would appreciate it if they used a condom, some teens (10% of females and 8% of males) still found the subject of condoms embarrassing to discuss with a new partner.    

As parents, our first priority from day one is keeping our kids safe, and helping them understand the importance of contraception when they do become sexually active is (whether we like it or not) a piece of this. Statistics like this suggests that talking to our kids about embarrassment, for example, could go a long way in increasing the number of teens who use condoms regularly.  

It’s Really About My Kid

As an educator, I would argue that we don’t ask enough of these types of questions, at least in part because there is a fear that doing so will send an unwitting message of acceptance or put ideas in young people’s heads. I don’t understand either of these fears; when the YRBS asks about drunk driving we don’t fear that teens will think we’re in favor of it and I can’t imagine an idea about sex that would come from a survey before it would come from say, MTV or Maxim magazine. (One thing parents can do to help out the public health community, by the way, is give permission for these types of surveys as they are anonymous and harmless.)

As a parent, of course, I care far less about what 52% of teens are doing or 95% of teens are thinking than I do about the thoughts and behaviors of the one (or two or three) teens living under my roof.  

So my suggestion is that we each conduct our own dinner-time survey of the teens we know. And don’t focus on who put what where and how often. Focus instead on what your teens are thinking and feeling about sex and what they think their friends are both thinking and doing. Use these surveys to start the conversation if that’s helpful or to correct misperceptions (teens, like adults, often overestimate the percentage of their peers who are having sex and the frequency with which they’re doing it, which may lead to peer pressure to become sexually active). And most importantly, use these conversations to help your kids think critically about teen sex.  This can only help them make responsible decisions.

Unless otherwise cited, all statistics from NSFG from: JC Abma, et al, “Teenagers in the United States: Sexual Contraceptive Use, and Childbearing, National Survey of Family Growth,“ National Center for Health Statistics, Vital Health Stat 23 (30). 2010.

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+PrintBlogger PostStumbleUponShare

Late Night Liberty: Sex in Public Places

I’ve always loved Ellen Degeneres – and I was lucky enough to catch her stand up act years ago. There was one bit that I found hysterically funny. She asked why people would film their sex, then went on to conclude that they must be super confident. OR, they would use the tape to “learn.” LOL! “What’s going on right here?!?!? I’ll tell you what is going on. NOTHING.”

Yes, that is what I thought about when I read an article in the Huffington Post about a restaurant named Mildred Temple’s Kitchen, located in Canada, that encouraged its patrons to have…ahem…sex…in the bathroom to “spice up their love life” on Valentine’s Day. Yes, the owners provided a french maid to make sure everything was “going smoothly and kept clean,” but you were encouraged to BYOC (Bring Your Own Condom).

I don’t know about you, but the thought of having sex in a public bathroom doesn’t exactly make me horny. Maybe its because I’m old and not as adventurous as I once was. Sigh…

So, this got me thinking about the days of yore. When I was young and everything still pointed…up. When I was adventurous and fearless. Ahhh…the good ol’ days. Where was the craziest place I had sex? Hmmm…I would have to say it was in the mountains, right by a creek, after a couple of hours of hiking. Not very comfortable. Not very discreet. Not very ladylike. But man, was it HOT! Until, of course, we realized that we had an audience….

What about you? What was the craziest place you had sex?

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+PrintBlogger PostStumbleUponShare

G-Spot ~ Is it a myth?

According to a recent study, the infamous g-spot is a “myth”.

Their study in the Journal of Sexual Medicine is the biggest yet, involving 1,800 women, and it found no proof.

The King’s College London team believe the G-spot may be a figment of women’s imagination, encouraged by magazines and sex therapists.

So, we have some – like German gynaecologist Ernst Gräfenberg, who the G-spot was named after – claim the G-spot does exist. We have this study, plus TONS of men who claim that it doesn’t. And we have some who claim that it is…subjective? What, like beauty? Then, we have others like Margaret Cho, who have heard of it, hasn’t found it, and paid to get it to “respond”, with no results.

The G-spot is described as a spongy surface that sits in the front wall of the vagina some 2-5cm up, and I’m sure it exists. I hope the guy I’m dating doesn’t read this study, or he may become an underachiever and stop trying hard enough!

What about you? Do you believe the G-spot exists? Have you found yours?

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+PrintBlogger PostStumbleUponShare

A new twist on sleepovers

What would you do if your 16 year old daughter came to you and asked if her boyfriend could sleep over? Sounds a little crazy and you may be thinking to yourself, has my daughter lost her mind? But the idea may not be so crazy after all. I recently came across some comparisons researchers have been doing in how in the U.S. we talk about and deal with adolescent sexuality compared to folks in the Netherlands.


When researchers compare the two countries, they find: teenagers in the U.S. and the Netherlands begin to engage in sexual activity at about the same age, but teenagers in the U.S. are nine times more likely to give birth than teens in the Netherlands, syphilis rates are more than twice those in the Netherlands, and gonorrhea rate in U.S. among adolescents is almost 33 times greater than the reported teen rates the Netherlands. You can see the comparisons at Advocates for Youth website.

Why the differences? A piece by John Santelli and Amy Schalet shed some light on the issues.  They say:

An important reason that European youth have better sexual health outcomes is that adults approach teenage sexuality differently than do adults in the United States. The Netherlands is a case in point: prior to the sexual revolution, sex outside of marriage met with strong disapproval. When the sexual behavior of young people changed in the decades that followed, Dutch parents and health care providers came to see sexual intercourse as an acceptable part of adolescent development, as long as youth were using contraceptives responsibly and involved in healthy relationships. Health care providers, policy makers, educators, and members of the media facilitated a normalization of adolescent sexuality by ensuring that young people had access to reliable contraception and by providing different public forums for the discussion of sexuality and relationships (Jones et al., 1986; Ketting & Visser, 1994).

The article goes on to talk about how in the U.S. parents — of course not MTers — but many parents “dramatize” adolescent sexuality and focus on the “dangers, conflicts, and difficulties of becoming a sexually active teenager.” On the other hand, the authors talk about how the Dutch “normalize sexuality” and view it as a normal part of development.  Here is how they describe a “sleepover.”

Parents also approached teenage sexuality very differently at home. The majority of U.S. parents interviewed opposed giving young people the opportunity to have sex. Dutch parents, on the other hand, counseled teenagers to move slowly and exercise caution, but most reported they would permit 16- and 17-year-old teenagers in steady relationships to spend the night with their boy- or girlfriends at home.
While permitting a teenage couple to spend the night together may seem like extreme parental laxity to parents in the United States, Dutch parents continue to exert a great deal of control over the terms of the sleepover. Most parents interviewed said they would permit a sleepover only when they saw that adolescents felt ready, were using contraceptives, and related in healthy and loving ways. By normalizing adolescent sexuality within distinct parameters, Dutch parents are able to maintain a connection with their adolescent children as they develop their sexual identities. (Several Dutch parents spontaneously mentioned that their child might prefer a same-sex partner.) Thus, Dutch parents can encourage their adolescent children to stay true to their own sense of readiness, can urge caution and contraceptive use, and are able to monitor the nature of their children’s romantic relationships. In fact, one reason that the Dutch parents cite for permitting the sleepover is a desire to stay connected to their children and prevent secrets which could interfere with open communication. By contrast, the dramatization of adolescent sexuality in American society instills fear of teenage sexuality among parents and teenagers, but gives them few tools to create an empowered sexual development.

Since my DDs are only 9 and 6 I figure I have a couple more years (but just a couple) to ponder this issue and I am curious to see what other MTers think about this idea.  

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+PrintBlogger PostStumbleUponShare

Late-Night Liberty: Gender-Neutral Child Edition

Tracy Clark-Flory over at Salon ran an interesting Q&A with Lise Eliot, a neuroscientist who penned the book, Pink Brain, Blue Brain: How Small Differences Grow Into Troublesome Gaps — and What We Can Do About It.

Eliot has found only two differences between boys and girls. One is that boys’ brains and their bodies are bigger than girls’. Also, girls’ brains stop growing roughly two years before boys’, although girls also enter puberty a couple years earlier than boys.

Eliot approached her book with an unemotional, academic eye, according to Clark-Flory. But here is what she had to say about everything from the so-called “boy crisis” to how we nurture gender expectations in our children.

After starting school, girls quickly surpass boys when it comes to reading and writing skills. Why do these academic differences so quickly reveal themselves?

Girls, there’s no question, talk more to each other even in preschool and toddler years. There are more words exchanged than between two boys. Magnify that over a couple years and you have more girls going to school with more verbal skills. With boys, you see the same thing with spatial skills, throwing things, building things and playing video games. Being aware of these different cognitive domains can help us as parents and teachers provide each child with more of a rounded experience early in life. It’s important to not give preschool children too much choice about what activity they do, because then you have kids separating by gender and only reinforcing their strengths.

What do you make of the so-called boy crisis?

I think there is something to the boy crisis. Girls are told, “You can be anything,” but when we tell boys that, we don’t really mean it. We actually mean, “as long as you’re not a preschool teacher, as long as you’re not a nurse.” As girls move into more and more realms, boys retreat. That’s because of the traditional idea that boys need to separate themselves from girls to feel masculine. The only way out of that is just a massive reeducation.

Should parents encourage boys to play with dolls?

Learning to be nurturing is important for everybody. Most people are going to grow up to be parents, whether they’re boys or girls, so it’s certainly something worth learning. Across cultures, children show a natural tenderness toward infants. It’s stronger in girls than boys, but it can and should be cultivated….

So, that said, what do we know about behavioral differences shortly after birth?

That’s another perfect example of how it’s both nature and nurture. In the first year of life, you don’t really see a strong difference. Both boy and girl infants like dolls, but at the first birthday you start to see boys gravitate away from the dolls and toward the trucks and balls. Three-year-old girls show a strong preference for dolls over toy trucks. By 5, they have an equal interest in trucks and dolls. What you see is that, at least in our modern society where girls see a broader range of role models or behaviors that are considered feminine, they open up and allow themselves to play with the trains, trucks and Legos.

When it comes to toy preference, you see some of the biggest differences in the ways parents respond when their kid picks up the “wrong” toy — especially when a boy picks up a girl toy. Children internalize that. They know darn well what mom and dad think about the toy they’re playing with. There is an initial biological bias toward these different toys, but then it’s very strongly reinforced socially. Studies show peers have a shaping influence. Certainly by age 3, children will pick the socially appropriate toy.

Interesting. The story mentioned a Swedish couple who refused to say what the gender of their child is. Only the people changing his or her diaper know. That is an extreme example, but I, too, often wonder how much a person’s traits are nature versus nurture.

Even though I have a boy and a girl, I haven’t raised them completely gender neutral. Eli has long hair and earrings — yes, I put them back in! — and Ari has short hair and boy clothes. I have exposed them to a variety of interests and they are all over the place. Ari likes to help me cook and can color for long stretches of time while Eli loves the outdoors and sports like soccer. They both like the same TV shows and books.

Do you think it is possible to raise gender-neutral children? How much of a child’s interests do you think are innate versus nurtured?

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+PrintBlogger PostStumbleUponShare

A Teen Sexual Behavior Calculator — What next?

Last night I stumbled upon an interesting website by the University of Maryland Medical Systems that provides people with health calculators. There are 24 “calculators” for people to figure out their BMI or risk for depression or fat intake for a day or teen sexual behavior. As I have written  before, a personal interest of mine is how we think about young people’s sexuality in our culture. So I checked out the Teen Sexual Behavior “calculator.” Basically it is twelve yes/no questions about your teen and at the end tells you your teen is “XX percent less likely to have sex compared to other teens of similar age.”  Here are some of the questions they ask.  I was most intrigued by the questions on religion. At the end they also provide a little blurb on the risk factors.



Question 1: Would you characterize your relationship with your teen as close and caring (i.e. satisfactory relationship with mother and/or father)?

Question 2: Has anyone in your family attempted suicide in the past 12 months?

Question 3: Does your teen understand that you disapprove of adolescent sex?

Question 4: Does your teen have a good experience at school (such as associates with friends, feels teachers are fair, likes going to school)?

Question 5: Does your teen’s school have a high average daily attendance in school?

Question 6: Does your teen attend a parochial school?

Question 7: Is your teen religious?

Question 8: Does your teen mention being at risk for an untimely death?

Question 9: Does your teen work 20 or more hours per week?

Question 10: Does your teen appear older than most teens of the same age?

Question 11: Does your teen get good grades?

Question 12: Has your teen pledged to remain a virgin?

I was somewhat concerned at the end of answering the questions the website promotes “virginity pledges” for teens. I have somewhat mixed feelings about these pledges — if it helps teens delay intercourse great but are we (greater US society) using the pledges as a way to get out of talking to our teens about sex? And what happens when they break the pledge —  studies by Drs. Hannah Brückner and Peter Bearman in the Journal of Adolescent Health (2005) and American Journal of Sociology (2001) indicated that taking a virginity pledge can help some young people to delay sexual initiation for up to 18 months, but that once these young people break their pledge, they are less likely to use contraception or condoms putting them at risk for unintended pregnancy and HIV or other STDs. (sorry could not find a link to the studies). So I guess at the end of the day it troubled me that a University Medical website was promoting something that in the end could make teens very unhealthy.

Anyway, thought the MT might find the questions interesting and would love to hear what think.

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+PrintBlogger PostStumbleUponShare

Surprise! It’s a……

Today was my 19-week ultrasound, A.K.A.: The Big One.

You know: the one where they can usually tell you if there are boy bits or girl bits floating around in there.

OK OK, I’ll cut to the chase:

IT’S A GIRL!!!! Yay!!!!

Or so they tell me. I will remain a tad skeptical until the wee one comes out and I can see for myself. :-)

At first, the little one tricked us. I could have sworn I saw a penis, but the technician told me it was the umbilical cord– placed strategically so we couldn’t determine anything.

A little later the technician said: “I can see what it is! But I’ll wait to tell you until we’re done measuring and your husband joins us.”

By the time DH came in our shy one was covered up again, but the technician said she had seen thethree telltale lines.

“How sure are you?” DH demanded.

She started to say “99…” then stopped and said, “I’m 95% sure.”

Good enough for now! They will do another ultrasound later in the pregnancy because the baby is breech, so they’ll want to see if she turns around while she still has plenty of room.

In any case, we’re delighted. I honestly would have been equally pleased with a boy; I was just relieved to see a strong heartbeat, along with hands and legs and a wonderfully wiggly spine.

DH has had his heart set on another girl, and I must admit I find the notion of sisters delightful. I never had a sister but often wished I did.

Finding out ahead of time was never a question for us. I’m a planner; we need a name, a nursery theme, a wardrobe and all that good stuff. But the first time around I also liked knowing it was my daughter, Maya, in there. By the time she came out it was like, “Oh there you are! Come join us!” Like a visit we had been looking forward to for so very long.

And as for the “surprise” factor: it was still a heck of a surprise when the technician broke the news to us. We just chose to get our surprise a little sooner :-)

What about you? Why did (or didn’t you) choose to find out the sex ahead of time? And how many “the ultrasound was wrong” stories have you heard? I only know of one, and the little girl is about 11 years old now. I am hoping today’s technology is significantly more reliable…

What’s everyone up to tonight? Chat away!!!

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+PrintBlogger PostStumbleUponShare

But how does it fit?

Sooo…I knew it was coming. Despite watching lots of David Attenborough and accepting without question the animals mating (and yes, I had hoped that that would do it for a few years…), I got the question tonight at dinner.


It started out innocuously enough. My five year old said “Why doesn’t Cody have any brothers or sisters?” I told her that his mom and dad decided to have only one child, and that people decided that for lots of reasons. Then she wanted to know how you decided how many kids to have. So I told her some reasons why we had decided to have two, and that other people have reasons for their numbers. And then she said “But how do you make that happen?” Uh oh.

I looked at my husband, and he looked at me, and then the coward went off to run the bath. So I said “Remember how those animals were mating to make babies? That’s what people do too.” And she said “Yeah, I know. The girls have the eggs and the boys fertilize them. But how does that work with people?”

I’m ashamed to admit it, but I did some serious fumbling before just explaining that the daddy’s penis goes into the mommy’s vagina to fertilize the eggs.

And then she asks, all wide-eyed innocence “But how does it fit?”

We got through it, but I’m not sure that I gave all the right answers. And, god help me, she’s going to ask for more information in a few days. She does that….sits on an idea until she needs a bit more information. So I know it’s coming. Any advice? How did you tell your little ones when they asked? How do you plan to do it if it hasn’t come up yet?

And do keep in mind…she’s not a child to be fobbed off. She knows when you’re not answering fully. She can smell fear.

FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+PrintBlogger PostStumbleUponShare