Edwards and C-sections
by anarchist mom
Sun Jan 06, 2008 at 09:58:05 AM PDT
Interesting diary. And I agree with you that an immediate c-section does not necessarily protect babies from maladies such as cerebral palsy. But I am not sure it is fair to hold this against Edwards and not ask the others on their position regarding maternal health. They would probably tell the doctor to perform the c-section, too, to avoid being sued if not by Edwards, then by some other trial attorney. 'Tis the American way, unfortunately. -Elisa
I don't hold disdain for John Edwards because he is a trial lawyer. I respect trial lawyers as an important part of our democracy; they are our last recourse against the gov't the huge corporations, etc., etc. Trial lawyers fight important battles for the American People everyday. Having said that, I've got a little problem with some of Edwards lawsuits and their implication for women's health.
- anarchist mom's diary :: Permalink ::
- There's more... (29 comments)

