Mother Talkers

Americans’ Obsession With Marriage

Thu Jan 24, 2008 at 03:56:45 PM PDT

Thanks to Salon’s broadsheet, I began reading the comments to this Newsweek “My Turn,” by a woman who decided not to legally marry her life partner who proposed to her.

When I read the original piece, I thought nothing of it. In her column, Emeryville, Calif. writer Bonnie Eslinger, wrote she did not need a “piece of paper” to validate her relationship with partner Jeff. Here are the reasons she cited:

I don't need a white dress to feel pretty, and I have no desire to pretend I'm virginal. I don't need to have Jeff propose to me as if he's chosen me. I don't need a ring as a daily reminder to myself or others that I am loved. And I don't need Jeff to say publicly that he loves me, because he says it privately, not just in words but in daily actions.

Our married friends say you can make a wedding—and a marriage—what you want, but that is not true. It's a specific institution with defining principles and values. If it weren't, there wouldn't be so-called marriage-protection laws in the majority of this country's states.

And for me, that's the bottom line when I consider cashing in on all the benefits our heterosexual relationship is entitled to. My gay friends can't do that. I don't want to send a message to anyone, including my daughter—who may someday choose a same-sex life partner—that the value of her relationships can be determined by law and the affirmation of others.

Jeff and Bonnie plan to have a commitment ceremony without clergy or the state. The reason she wrote this piece for Newsweek -- at least this is my interpretation -- is because she hopes that family will show up to the commitment ceremony; that she is tired of nosy questions such as, “When are you going to get married?” -- which, BTW, should be filed away with the annoying “When are you going to have a baby?” -- or, the insinuation that her relationship is less “real” because they are not legally married.

My husband and I did go the legal route, although no one except the judge and a security guard and clerk who acted like our witnesses actually saw it. We decided to get the "piece of paper" because my husband needed health benefits from me and we wanted to legally protect the children we planned to have. I do think there are financial benefits to marriage especially if you start out young and broke like us.

But we also had  a non-legal and non-denominational commitment ceremony in El Salvador, which was met with skepticism by especially older family members. DH’s grandmother refused to show up because “it doesn’t mean anything.” My grandmother almost did not go because there was no priest at the wedding. At the end of the ceremony, which was marked by a bonfire at the beach and the writing of our own vows, she told me it was the most beautiful ceremony she had ever witnessed. There you go.

  • ::

That said, the questions leading up to the ceremony and all the pestering were annoying.

Like Salon’s Carol Lloyd, I found myself shaking my head at some of the reader comments to Eslinger’s piece, such as this gem:

My biggest issue right now is the hype with wich emdeecee is rejecting every rejection of this article.

Feminism is about female equality, not selfish power. Feminisim is about being viewed as a human being worth respect, not as a "man" (which really goes against feminism, to think that we should be treated just like men).

There are TWO halves of this species - male and female. We work together to make this world work. Neither is more superior than the other (including ms bonnie and emdeecee). Each one has their own strengths and weaknesses. RESPECTING eachother is crucial.

Ms. Bonnie was proposed to by a man who wanted to get married, but she did not respect HIS wish, and instead continued to indulge in her own. HE wanted committment and to display his committment in a bond that (if broken) could potentially hurt him more than her. He was willing to sacrifice his own autonomy and put his trust in her committment to him by seeking a legally binding union with the woman he loved.

SHE spurned the marriage idea, in acceptance of an individualized relationship that both are free to walk out of with no repercussions (except some hurt feelings). She does not need to put any trust in his devotion as far as legal standings go, she is as committed as my 16 year old brother is to his girlfriend.

THIS is not feminism at its finest. It does not uphold the idea that woman are equal to men, it does not uphold the strengths that women have (on a social or individual level). It tears down a social institution that may be abused, may have lost some cultural relevance due to that abuse, but is no less relevant (and if you disagree, provide me with good reasons why not).

Believe it or not, life is not relative. It actually is not all about you.

(Begin the parade of 5 year olds all crying out "ME ME ME")

There were similar anti-feminist rants, including "even Gloria Steinem got married!" Whatever.

Again, I do think there are legal protections and benefits to marriage. But if you don’t want them, then -- who cares? I cannot muster the strength to get worked up over someone who doesn’t want to get married. And no, I do not view someone else’s decision to marry or not marry as a threat to my own marriage. If anything, let’s leave marriage to the people who actually want it. Sheesh.

Tags: marriage obsession, Newsweek, My Turn, Salon, broadsheet, Bonnie Eslinger, feminism, Jeff (all tags)

View Comments | 28 comments