Mother Talkers

Birth Control Underground in the Philippines

Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 11:30:56 AM PDT

There was much press coverage this past week on Pope Benedict XVI's first visit to the United States, including a massive mass at Yankee Stadium. But the Washington Post recently highlighted a sad part of the Catholic Church's agenda keeping many Filipinas in poverty: its visceral opposition to birth control.

There are many reasons why this country is poor, including feudal patterns of land ownership and corrupt government. But there is a compelling link between family size and poverty. It increases in lock step with the number of children, as nutrition, health, education and job prospects all decline, government statistics and many studies show.

Birth and poverty rates here are among the highest in Asia. And the Philippines, where four out of five of the country's 91 million people are Roman Catholic, also stands out in Asia for its government's rejection of modern contraception as part of family planning.

Acceding to Catholic doctrine, the government for the past five years has supported only what it calls "natural" family planning. No national government funds can be used to buy contraceptives for the poor, although anyone who can afford them is permitted to buy them. Local governments can also buy and distribute contraceptives, but many lack the money...

"Family planning helps reduce poverty," President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo said in a 2003 speech that detailed her approach to birth control. But she said then and has since insisted that the government would support only family planning methods acceptable to the Catholic Church.

  • ::

Interestingly, Arroyo has admitted to using birth control pills in the past. But she confessed to a priest so all is forgiven.

What is unforgivable are the conditions some of her fellow patriots must live because of her policies. Women like Maria Susana Espinoza who lives with her husband and four children in a squatter's hut in "a vast, stinking garbage dump by Manila Bay," according to the Washington Post. Espinoza recently encountered health workers at the garbage dump and is about to get an IUD device on the down low.

The organization that is helping Espinoza agreed to introduce this reporter to her on condition that it not be named. The group's health workers said they fear retaliation and harassment from officials in the national and city government, as well as from the Catholic Church.

In 2005, Catholic bishops in the southern Philippines announced that they would refuse Communion to government health workers who distributed birth control devices.

The Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines maintains that birth control has broken up families because it allows for people to have extramarital affairs and get abortions. Okay.

But as economists quoted by WaPo point out, its next door neighbor, Thailand, was able to reduce birthrates -- and poverty -- by dispensing birth control to the poor.

"Even when there is widespread corruption, insurgent violence and other powerful reasons for poverty, the evidence from across Asia is that good population policy by itself contributes to significant poverty reduction," said Ernesto M. Pernia, professor of economics at the University of the Philippines.

The silver lining in this depressing story is public opinion surveys do show that about 90 percent of Filipinos support government funding of contraceptives for people who can't afford them. Surveys have also found that poor families have significantly more unwanted pregnancies than richer families and a harder time getting birth control, according to WaPo.

Now, if only the old guys at the church hierarchy would agree...

Tags: Philippines, birth control, IUD, Washington Post, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, Catholic Church (all tags)

Permalink | 12 comments

  • Huh? (0 / 0)

    The Catholic Bishops' Conference of the Philippines maintains that birth control has broken up families because it allows for people to have extramarital affairs and get abortions.

    Because affairs and abortions would never happen if there were no birth control, right?

    The abortion argument in particular seems backwards.

  • Here's the deal (0 / 0)

    and as a Catholic, I firmly believe this to be true: the patriarchy of the Church firmly believes that Sexual Pleasure is a sin, and that is that. I cannot see it any other way. It's taking the virginity of Mary and blowing it WAAAAAAAAAAAAY out of proportion, IMO.

    First is the "purity" of the priests, removing their ability to marry. While I will bitch slap the next person who tells me that the Catholic church is encouraging pedophilia by not allowing them to marry (HELLO, DIFFERENT URGES PEOPLE!) I will say it's making a strong case against Sex by sticking to the plan.

    Essentially, the only way a person can have sex and not be sinning is if they are doing it to procreate. Even if you're married, the refusal for the acceptance of Birth Control makes it such that sex acts should be performed, between married people, with the willingness for child rearing as a "consequence" firmly accepted. And that's what the church has made children- a consequence, instead of a gift. How sad is that????

    It's also, IMO, the main reason behind the inability to accept homosexuality- I cannot believe that a simple line in Leviticus is what has spurred the vitriol against homosexuality. The fact is, homosexual sex has only one physical purpose- sexual pleasure (there is of course a host of emotional purposes for sex between anyone, but that's not the problem here).

  • I'm confused (0 / 0)

    I looked up the 10 Commandments and it says nothing about sex is a sin.  If you take red blooded men and tell them no sex, they screw each other.  Just look at prisons.  Prisons and the priesthood.  Guys are screwing machines unless they are on Lipitor.  I knwo this goof ball from college who became an ultra anti abortionist/natural planning freak.  She and her husband joined the Catholic church years after staning outside abotion clincs protesting.  She used to get up every morning at 6 am to stick a thermometer up her ass to check her basal temp to prevent pregnancy.  Guess what?  Dumbass has 7 kids in 11 years!  She was a scientist and did not know that women often ovulate more than once a month.  She even counsels women on natural birth control at her church!  She is the head of the program.  

  • You know... (0 / 0)

    ... I've had a rocky relationship with the Catholic Church my whole adult life. It took me over a year to be comfortable with the idea of having our son baptized (it means a lot to my in-laws) and 6 months ago we finally found a church that is liberal enough that I don't mind going on a regular basis. I've tried to focus more on what's going on in our local church rather than what the Vatican does. But stuff like this just makes me want to quit all over again.

    The Vatican has mostly given up on trying to enforce their backwards family planning agendas on Westerners - they know that almost no one's following the party line. So they go to poor countries where they have a monopoly on power, and they enforce them there, on the people who can least afford it and who have no other options.

    In Catholic terms, I really do think that the Vatican's position on birth control is sinful - they doom millions of people to a life of poverty and disease when they refuse to condone condoms or any kind of birth control. It's directly contrary to the Church's teachings - you're supposed to minister to people in poverty, not keep them there.

  • It is wrong to characterize Catholic moral (0 / 0)

    theology as being somehow oppposed to the pleasure of sex. There is a whole body of thought characterized by John Paul's "theology of the body" that you can look up. Official church teaching holds sex is not sinful as long as it is within the marital union and that the conjugal act is open to the conception of new life.

    Admittedly, the church's teaching on birth control is honored in the breach and 99% of clerics give it a wink and a nod. It's really not a big issue anymore, from a practical standpoint. I speak as a progressive pro-lifer. We refer to the Catholic Church as the "family business": my brother is a Jesuit priest, my sister really is a sister (Maryknoll nun), a cousin is a bishop in the Vatican diplomatic corps, other cousins work at the Vatican, and a few are members of Opus Dei.

    Rome puts forth her teaching but full well knows what is really going on. A cardinal (who shall remain nameless) once told me that he believes Jesus knows how hard we have it down here and only expects us to give it the old "college try," but that in the end He is satisfied with most of what we do, shortcomings and all. He was also of the opinion--and I agree--that economic crimes against social justice will be judged much more harshly than sexual failings and personal shortcomings, which will get a nod.

Permalink | 12 comments