Should Teenagers Get Family Leave?
Thu Mar 13, 2008 at 08:10:03 AM PDT
To that question, I say "yes." Regardless of your age, if you have a child you should receive family leave like any other American. In my utopia, that leave would be paid.
But some irked tax payers in the city of Denver would beg to differ. As Brain, Child magazine recently pointed out in its news briefs, there was a case back in January, in which pregnant Denver high school students requested four weeks leave following the birth of their babies. They do not want to be counted as "absent" and want the right to make up their schoolwork. A couple high school counselors approached the school board, but as far as I know, the district has yet to make a decision.
However, according to this Denver Post article, it sounds like it favored changing its policy to accommodate the pregnant teens.
East High School administrators could not be reached for comment over the winter break, but district officials say they are reviewing the policy on absences to make it "friendlier" to new moms, said DPS spokesman Alex Sanchez.
Kayla Lewis, who is five months pregnant and a senior at East, requested that the board establish maternity leave for students at a Dec. 20 public hearing.
"After you have the baby, your body needs time to heal," the 18-year-old said...
School-board member Michelle Moss was baffled that schools were giving girls unexcused absences after birth.
"It's critical that these young women have a chance to bond with their babies," Moss said. "Maybe we do need a policy. Clearly, as a district, we have to look at what is going on with our young women. We've got to look at the birth-control issues and teen pregnancy and how we best help them deal with it and still graduate."
Denver, BTW, has one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the state, according to the Post. "Of every 1,000 girls ages 15 to 17, 54.5 will become pregnant in the city, compared with 24.3 throughout Colorado, according to state health statistics," the article stated.
Not surprisingly, if you scroll down in the article, some readers blasted the proposed measure.
The last thing these girls need is a 4 week vacation from school to "bond" with their baby! If their priorities were more focused on school to begin with, they would not be in this situation. What to do.
DPS already uses teachers to go to homebound students; sounds like these girls are perfect candidates for the homebound student program. Additionally DPS needs to get childcare in the schools pronto for these girls. Any program should also involve the "dads". Clearly they must not be stepping up to help with the "bonding" or other responsibilities of raising a baby or these girls would not be asking for relief!
Finally, whoever is in charge of DPS' program to reduce teen pregnancies needs to be held accountable and fired - they clearly are failing in their task. Children raising children is a serious issue with long-term consequences - most all bad.
Posted by Marie Trujillo (aka Proud Blue Star Mom)
at 7:53 AM on Monday Jan 7
It sounds like becoming pregnant while in a Denver high school is roundly accepted instead of being discouraged.
So again KA CHING KA CHING.
Glad I'm not a Denver taxpayer.
Posted by B (aka Byaks)
at 7:54 AM on Monday Jan 7
Taxpayers pay for the school. Students can request, but society need not cave. Students who become pregnant and wish time to recover from delivery and bond with a baby must withdraw as a full time student for a semester or a term to concentrate on caring for themselves and providing for the infant. One cannot properly or fairly do both. The school, other students and staff ought not be in any way penalized; nor should the child or the student's family be inconvenienced. Women who choose to be mothers must realize that they--not society--must accept responsability for that life. And what about the father? Shall we permit bonding time?
Posted by Janice Taylor (aka Colorado Cookie)
at 8:31 AM on Monday Jan 7
Of course, there were many comments supportive of the girls; that they deserve our compassion and not ridicule. Also, I do not buy into the theory by making it more difficult for them to graduate this will somehow curb teenage pregnancy. What do you think, MotherTalkers?
In related news, one in four American girls has a sexually transmitted disease, according to the Associated Press.
A virus that causes cervical cancer is by far the most common sexually transmitted infection in teen girls aged 14 to 19, while the highest overall prevalence is among black girls — nearly half the blacks studied had at least one STD. That rate compared with 20 percent among both whites and Mexican-American teens, the study from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found.
About half of the girls acknowledged ever having sex; among them, the rate was 40 percent. While some teens define sex as only intercourse, other types of intimate behavior including oral sex can spread some infections.
I know we have discussed this before, but when I read such scary information, I feel like we need a refresher. How do you convince children that waiting to have sex and practicing safe sex is the way to go?
Permalink | 14 comments