Mother Talkers

Scrotums and Censorship

Sun Feb 18, 2007 at 09:29:37 AM PDT

When I was growing up, my mother taught us the proper words for everything from the beginning. We did not "pee-pee," we urinated. We had a "BM." We knew the clinical names for vagina and penis and we were given clear and honest answers to any question we ever asked.

So when I saw this article today in the NYTimes, I had to shake my head very much like my father does when he finds something completely ridiculous.

Apparently there are some librarians with their undies in a wad about the use of the word "scrotum" in a children's book called "The Higher Power of Lucky," by Susan Patron.

Patron is this year's winner of the Newberry Medal, the most prestigious award in children's literature, and there are moves in many areas to ban her book.

"The book's heroine, a scrappy 10-year-old orphan named Lucky Trimble, hears the word through a hole in a wall when another character says he saw a rattlesnake bite his dog, Roy, on the scrotum.

"Scrotum sounded to Lucky like something green that comes up when you have the flu and cough too much," the book continues. "It sounded medical and secret, but also important.""

(my formatting sucks, pardon me)

I think it is absolutely ridiculous to ban a book which uses the medically approved name for a human's body part. The way Patron describes it through her character there is both hilarious and completely reasonable to me, and seems as if it would make the whole thing a little more humorous and light-hearted for a little boy or little girl learning about  his or her body.

What say you, MotherTalkers? Would you be offended by your ten year old reading this? Do you not think they should probably already know the proper term for their scrotum by that age? Might this move to censor this book be a clear indication of how sex-negative our culture is, at a time when we clearly need full disclosure for the health and safety of our children?

Tags: (all tags)

Permalink | 23 comments

  • I am always puzzled (0 / 0)

    by a culture that censors books with proper medical terminology while celebrating pap shots of Brittney Spears' naked crotch flash.

    I guess you can surmise that I wouldn't have a problem with Jess reading that in a book.

    • Same Here! (0 / 0)

      and children today are much more mature than adults often think and can certainly handle a word like scrotum. (Actually some kids are way too mature for their own good, but that is whole other issue...)
  • Wow... (0 / 0)

    at 10 I would hope a child would know the proper medical terminology!  That's crazy.  It's just a body part... whatever.
  • Some people need to get a life! (0 / 0)

    What would these librarians prefer the author call it?  I can think of some truly colorful  terms that I have heard over the years! I would sincerely hope that by ten years old my child, or any child for that matter, would know the proper names for all the parts of the body.
  • names for private parts (0 / 0)

    I try to get my son to use words like scrotum - in his second grade class, he is learning other kids' terms. One he favors is "gutter" - like, " I am going to punch you in the gutter."
    I mean, snakes don't bite? Dogs don't have scrotums?  What is the problem here?

    This sounds like a book I would give my son to read.

  • This brought back one of my (0 / 0)

    favorite memories of ds and I waiting in a long grocery line at Safeway.  He was all of about three at the time when he said, "Mom, my scrotum itches..."  I still giggle now at the scene.  I loved that we were open enough to talk with words that didn't gloss over something as simple as a part of his body.  

    Our culture sends such amazingly outrageous mixed messages --- it's a wonder we can manage through our days.  It's inconceivable to me that a book would be banned for including this word.  WHAT?  

    I can understand that yes, it might seem slightly awkward to some teachers if, when they are having reading time with young children, they are asked to define this word, which is what the article suggests.  

    But, on the other hand, education, and teaching about correct terms etc., is exactly what a teacher or good education is required to do...If our kids can't learn new words and the definitions in school, I would guess we are in a heap of trouble.

    sigh.

  • let's improve her sales ranking (0 / 0)

    Go to amazon and put a few copies in your cart (I put 20!).  This book is currently selling at #31.

    The author is a sister who could use our moral support, I'm guessing.  

  • a friend's son was (0 / 0)

    recently sent to the principal's office for using the word "penis" -- in a 6th grade class, during a health lesson.  That freaked me out.  

    I am glad my son's school teaches sex ed early, often, and accurately.

     

  • Just throwing this out (0 / 0)

    Maybe I'm in the minority and maybe if I actually read the book I would feel differently, but is anyone else disturbed by the idea of a rattlesnake biting a dog's scrotum?  I'm against censorship and think it is ridiculous to censor a book for using that term but doesn't that seem disturbing?  The thought of that happening just gives me the willies.
    • huh huh huh (0 / 0)

      you said "willies". huh huh huh </end Butthead voice>

      Hmm... haven't read the book, so I can't comment, but it's probably drawn from real life one way or another. Dogs do occasionally get killed by snakebite on farms.

  • SCHOOL vs PUBLIC Libraries (0 / 0)

    I am not sure if the NYTs article mentions--

    1. Susan Patron, the author of HIGHER POWER OF LUCKY and this year's Newbery medalist, is herself a librarian in California.

    2. the librarians saying they will not stock the book in their libraries work for SCHOOL, and not public, LIBRARIES; have no fear that public libraries will indeed buy A HIGHER POWER OF LUCKY.

    3. the librarians first raised their issue with the novel over a listserve for school librarians

    4. these librarians claim they are not going to buy the book because they fear that PARENTS will challenge the book's presence in the school library. (A nasty case of prior restraint exists in that decision, in my opinion, but I have no knowledge of the law as applied to school libraries

    I can count two Newbery medalists (the top medal and a Newbery Honor) as friends. The children's writing community is a tight bunch. The issue is not going to go away in our lifetime, particularly in this darkened political era. I do know that librarians and authors are not inherent enemies, and, if anything, it is traditionally a mutual admiration society.

    This story is far from over. Stay tuned. ;>

    George Bush doesn't care about people. I do.

    by WriterRoss on Sun Feb 18, 2007 at 09:33:56 PM PDT

    • Intellectual Freedoms and School Librarians (0 / 0)

      http://publishersweekly.com/...

      Statistics from the ALA's Office of Intellectual Freedom show that although the total number of book challenges was slightly lower in 2005, the vast majority of reported challenges came from school libraries, followed closely by schools. School library materials traditionally come under more scrutiny than those at public libraries, for a variety of reasons. School librarians are usually working within a smaller budget than their public library counterparts and have an additional duty to support the school's curriculum as well as answer to school administrators. This frequently means tighter guidelines for purchasing fiction. In addition, because students in a school setting are a more "captive" audience than patrons of a public library, the materials that students have access to at school are usually more closely monitored by parents.

      Well aware of these factors, many school librarians and teachers are more vigilant than ever about selecting materials that will not raise parental or community concern. Unfortunately, such vigilance can lead to self-censorship that keeps books from getting onto, or remaining on, school library shelves.

      George Bush doesn't care about people. I do.

      by WriterRoss on Sun Feb 18, 2007 at 09:46:32 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    • thanks for clarifying this (0 / 0)

      I always got the impression that professional librarians were anti-censorship and I didn't understand that school librarians had a different approach.  It sounds from what I've read that the school librarians' style is a little more touch-feely and less oriented to free speech (e.g., "I'm not sure I'm going to buy it for our school, I'm not comfortable talking about 'scrotum'").  I guess they need to project out what the parent responses will be to their decisions, while the public librarians don't?
  • Boxing? -- not on topic (0 / 0)

    (I'm sorry. I wish I knew how to box text in the gray color. Any link pointing to this sort of HTML help gratefully appreciated.)

    George Bush doesn't care about people. I do.

    by WriterRoss on Sun Feb 18, 2007 at 09:59:34 PM PDT

  • Question (0 / 0)

    Here's my question...

    I hope the dog doesn't have any testes in that scrotum sack...he should be neutered.

Permalink | 23 comments