Mother Talkers

The Story of Stuff

Sun Dec 30, 2007 at 03:02:19 AM PDT

I just saw this awesome short video, and need to pass it on to all of you.  It's called the Story of Stuff, and is similar to An Inconvenient Truth in that it just makes you think "Wow, I really didn't realize how bad this is."  The video is 20 minutes long, so you might need to set aside time to watch it, but it's definitely worthwhile.

The themes addressed seem to be things we're thinking about here at MTs lately, with recent diaries on too many toys and consumerism.  I'm debating whether to send this to my family, who ignored our pleas to keep Christmas simple this year and instead sent us home with a minivan full of stuff, ranging from huge trucks that dominate our play area to tiny toothbrush holders that don't fit our toothbrushes.

One of my favorite parts is the description of how we get sucked into this cycle of needing the newest stuff year after year to fit in, and how we're stuck in this work-watch-shop cycle.  Also, the history of how government influenced our consumer society was fascinating.  I'd love to discuss this with others who are interested in this topic.

Tags: stuff, consumerism (all tags)

Permalink | 11 comments

  • I watched it a week ago (0 / 0)

    One part of the video really stuck with me: 99% of everything we buy is no longer used after 6 months.  While this probably includes consumables (toilet paper, food) it is still astounding.

    I think the biggest potential for change lies in the government. The video made this point quite well also. I hope people don't overlook it.

    Even if many more consumers acted sustainably, the corporations would still be generating tons of waste and chewing up the environment for their own purposes.

    Corporations are scary entities because they are beholden only to shareholders. Yet, many shareholders have only a tiny piece of any company in a huge basket of mutual funds.  For example, I don't know what stocks are being held in my retirement fund. So, who holds corporations responsible when they are strangling our planet and our democracy?

    While I think there are great things that can only be accomplished by corporate entities, if some checks and balances are not instituted...  Well, I don't want to be gloomy this close to the New Year. :)

    Mother wannabe, ETA Spring 09 if biology allows.

    by faedrake on Sun Dec 30, 2007 at 09:29:35 AM PDT

  • Ugh (0 / 0)

    I watched this a few weeks ago.  

    But did it stop me from wrapping up a cart full of pollution for Christmas?  

    I intended to find thoughtful, hand-made, non-toxic, non-plastic, open-ended toys, but I totally ran out of time.  

    So I ran up to Kmart on the 23rd and filled up a cart full of pollution, I mean toys, to at least have a few things for my kids to open on Christmas.

    Relative to other families, I probably bought very little. It sure didn't look like much when I brought it home and I did end up buying open-ended toys as opposed to crap with batteries that talk to you.  But still.

    On the bright side, they are still keeping the kids busy and we had a blast on Christmas.

  • It's such a Dilemma (0 / 0)

    We are first time parents.

    Foster parents to three under the age of five.

    We trashed up the place.  It was really more about me & my husband than the kids.  We bought some good stuff (Lincoln Logs, Legos) and we bought a bunch of Dora and Diego CRAP.  We just wanted them to have "one true Christmas" - with all of their expectations.  But it turned out they were our expectations - not theirs.

    We had a blast.  They had a blast.  I will try & do better.  I had my husband laminate a picture of a landfill and have put it over my trash can.  

    Peace.

  • mixed feelings (0 / 0)

    I viewed this video at work, because the organization behind it is closely affiliated with the one I work for. I really respect the people involved in its making, and I found it to be a pretty powerful little cartoon, and yet...

    I wondered who they thought the audience was. I don't know if this could get traction outside of liberal/progressive circles who are already hip to the message. There were sentences here and there that would totally alienate conservatives, people who work for corporations, and people who work in extractive industries. That's a lot of folks.

    There is a line near the beginning about spending on war. I may agree with it, but it was a throwaway line that would alienate conservatives right off the bat and make them close their ears to the rest.

    There's another line describing extractive industries (mining, logging, etc.) that says, "in other words, exploitation." I kinda wanted to call foul because I think that's hypocritical. All of us are watching that video on computers that contain many components that were derived through mining. We are deeply dependent on those industries, so I think it's flip to paint the whole thing with the broad description of "exploitation."

    Other than that, I really liked it! But sometimes I despair that the message won't get as far as it might because of cultural blind spots.

    • I agree (0 / 0)

      And my ears certainly perked up when she mentioned how toxic breast feeding is...although she covered over by reiterating "breast is best". But surely if you have to smooth a comment over like that, it would be best to skip it altogether in this sort of message?

    • Definitely (0 / 0)

      I agree.  Parts could definitely be hugely alienating.

      I also thought the ending and solutions fell a little flat.  

      I was waiting for "the answer", and she basically started throwing out all of these technical production terms like "zero waste" and "sustainability."  They have a general meaning of course, but she was using them in a very technical way.

      Not to be too nitpicky, but she also made a point of saying how she uses an old clunky computer, but then in the beginning said how she flew all around the world doing her research for the past ten years.

      Maybe it was intended just to fire up the people already on board with the overall message?

      • Maybe so... (0 / 0)

        It did have that affect for me (of firing up a person already onboard with the message).

        The org that Annie Leonard used to head up focused on shutting down trash  incinerator projects in various locations around the world, and offering communities the technical support to devise other waste handling methods that would pollute less and bring communtities more jobs/revenue. So that accounted for her flying around the world.

        I totally agree with your assessment of "the answer," which I felt was similarly minimal in Al Gore's movie (although in a different way). Maybe she thought it was sufficient to throw out those technical terms and hope that people would find out more about them later.

        Zero Waste and Extended Producer Responsibility are really great ideas that have produced solid results in some European countries, but it's true that most people (other than solid waste enthusiasts!) don't have any idea what these terms mean.

        As for "sustainability," I fear that word is reaching serious overkill these days, and is in danger of losing its meaning altogether. Kindof like "natural" did a few years back...

        • asdf (0 / 0)

          Very much like Al Gore's movie in terms of the end.  You were totally on board, and then left rather despondent at the end, like, what do I do now?  I guess I could change my bulbs to CFLs?  

          Although, I will say the Story of Stuff did inspire me to really start thinking about our personal consumption in the future, much more seriously.

          "Sustainability" has become a term for anything that isn't made out of plastic these days, as far as I can see.  Argh!

    • yet so much is true.. (0 / 0)

      i work in the computer industry and this is a very  hot hot topic...the whole idea that all you really need to replace is a small chip.  and then the whole recycling thing which really ends up meaning computer manufacturers recycle,but in the real end?  it goes to china where it is burned and guess what contributes to all those lead toys.

      this video may be playing to the base and yes, i agree it isn't going to sway conservatives.  but it sways me and i bet most of us.  i don't walk the walk as much as i should or even could. someone has to lead and i think this video gives those who are believers a push and a start and a reason to get going.

  • I will find time to watch (0 / 0)

    That said, I learned a lot during 2007 about our stuff.  Through a series of circumstances we found ourselves with 4 different addresses over the course of the year, and while that was very hard on all of us the silver lining is that it has truly taught us how little stuff we actually need.  With each move we tossed or gave away more stuff, and took less and less with us.  Presently we're in a temporary apartment, and have unpacked about 1/3 of our remaining stuff.  Hopefully we will soon make the next move into a home, and we're debating if we should even bother looking at the other 2/3 of our stuff.  

    I'm sure we will go through all the boxes and find lots of things that we can't live without.  Pictures on the walls would be nice, as would all the baby clothes and toys packed up for #2 (not to mention my maternity clothes, which I can't find for love or money and have finally, reluctantly, started to replace.  But why must they be so expensive!  And am I the only one that hates shopping for them?).  

    But part of me would be very happy chucking it all.  And I aspire to maintain our current purchasing habits, which have been low given that we know that whatever we buy, we have to move!

    --R

  • just watched this...so late! (0 / 0)

    but thank you for sending.  a dear friend sent to me as well and i have passed along.  perfect as i was tossing out all the xmas lights i bought that failed due to the no cal storm.  so much stuff...

Permalink | 11 comments