Mother Talkers

U.S. Versus Japan on Class Sizes

Tue Dec 18, 2007 at 01:50:35 PM PDT

If there is one question our school regularly fields from prospective parents it is our class sizes or student-to-teacher ratios. (Answer: 1:7 for preschool, although typically, 1:6 for the three-year-olds. And 1:9 for elementary school.)

As the synopsis of this Comparative Education Review edition suggests, the popular wisdom of U.S. preschool experts is less is more. That it is important for preschoolers to receive individualized attention from their teachers.

In this same synopsis, it was fascinating to learn that in Japan, preschools typically boast up to a 1-to-30 teacher-student ratio.

Japanese preschool teachers and administrators watched and commented on videotapes of Japanese and U.S. preschools. In contrast to American notions of home-school continuity and the mothering role of the preschool teacher, Japanese educators saw their large preschool classes (of approximately 30 students) as teaching overly individualistic, pampered Japanese preschoolers to become responsible members of a group.

I want to point out that the ages of the Japanese children in question were 4- and 5-years-old, not 3-years-old or younger as many American children start school. But as the summary pointed out -- I have not read the actual book or article, which has to be ordered -- Japanese schools are pretty stringent and churn out high-achieving students. Considering the high student-teacher ratios, what gives?

Not having read the book, I am guessing it has to do with cultural expectations and universal thinking on the part of parents across the board. In an American school, teachers are serving children of different races, ethnicities, classes, education levels of the parents -- plus we honor individuality in learning styles and educational philosophies. We don’t have a “one size fits all” approach to education as I am assuming the Japanese have.

It’s an interesting topic. I know I have a preference for the lower student-teacher ratios, but I never realized how much that preference was formed by American culture. Why do you think we have a strong preference for lower student-teacher ratios, MotherTalkers?  

  • ::

Tags: Japan, class size, student-to-teacher ratio, preschool (all tags)

Permalink | 11 comments

  • Raising Cain documentary (0 / 0)

    This documentary really made me re-evaluate when I saw how differently the Japanese pre-school teacher treated her class from what I expected in the U.S.

    She was totally hands off during playtime, letting the kids police themselves, hit each other, and figure out who to shun on their own, like a 4yr. old lord of the flies scene. It all sounds bad, but go see it. It actually made me step back and listen to my kid's interactions more than get involved. Age 4 kids can often work it out without adults. Pretty cool!

    This is different from the ratio question Elisa is posing, but heck, I'm open to learning why a higher ratio could be better. They're probably right from a whole different angle that I haven't considered.

    • Raising Cain... (0 / 0)

      is in my netflix cue. I can't wait to see it!

      This is the first time, I heard of the higher ratio anywhere else. I just assumed everyone was on the same page as U.S. educators where less is better. I didn't know it was addressed in Raising Cain, too. Cool.

      • I don't think the ratio (0 / 0)

        was directly addressed in Raising Cain, but the hands off thing (perhaps the hands off of self-policing 4 year olds leads to higher ratio?) was pretty interesting.

        Yeah, enjoy it! I should watch it again.

  • The preschool (0 / 0)

    that Madeline goes to, is a teaching lab.  So, the child to teacher ratio is really low...2:1.  I'm quite pleased with the school and even though it's not Reggio-Emilia or Montessori, it gives her an opportunity to experience what school will be like.  There's a decent amount of structure... something she'll have to get used to for kindergarten.  

    I think a lot of parents prefer a low child to teacher ratio (especially at the preschool age), because they are afraid something might happen if the teacher is otherwise occupied. Also, it's got to be easier for a teacher to handle a smaller amount of students.  I'm guessing it also helps to stave off teacher burnout as a result.  

    I was not familiar with the way Japanese preschools were run.  Very interesting.  I don't think I'd be comfortable with that format myself.  I co-teach our UU Sunday School preschool class and some days we have a lot of kids in the room.  Even then, we have parent volunteers stay and the ratio never gets any higher than 1:4.  We let the kids do a lot of free play and try not to intervene unless there's hitting or a temper tantrum involved.  

  • wildly non-homogenious culture (0 / 0)

    I think that our culture has such variety in teaching preschoolers how to behave, more teachers are needed  to maintain order and coax kids into classroom behavior. On the other hand, Japan places high cultural value on conformity, so one can assume that they are more schooled in that at home.

    Personally, I think the smaller classes are needed because of the small number of real behavioral problems that show - I certainly recall my son's public kindergarten class, with one kid so belligerent that he had to bed down away from other kids, next to the entrance to the class, for naptime. He would grab pillows, teddy bears, etc. and I don't think he improved all year.

  • Fascinating (0 / 0)

    I have no idea how they do it. An American teacher would get fried to a crisp - I know I would.

    There is no way this would work at our school, particularly given that nearly half of the kids are  English learners. There is also dramatic variation in how well prepared the kids are. Some are writing their names and reading, and some are being introduced to the idea of a pencil.

  • interesting (0 / 0)

    There's a big difference between a 5 year old and a 3 year old, or if live where I live, 2.5 years old which is when preschool programs start.  That could play in.

    I also wonder if they kick more kids out?

    I can't imagine 30 4 year olds in a room trying to get something done with one teacher.

  • small doses (0 / 0)

    I think sometimes it would do younger children good to be in large group situations to get a different perspective. That said, an all day classroom situation with 30 toddlers seems a bit much. I think chun yang hit the nail on the head with the strong emphasis on conformity.

    • I guess it depends too (0 / 0)

      on what they're trying to do. If they're all supposed to be sitting at tables coloring, that's a different situation than if you're just turning them loose on a kid-safe playground all day with a nice big fence around it.
  • I want bigger classes (0 / 0)

    at the elementary level and above.  My school system is very focused on small class sizes (my oldest typically had about 15 in her elementary school).  Small class sizes are great if all your teachers are truly qualified.  What it meant for my daughter was a lot of mediocre teachers, none of whom knew math well enough to teach it.  Unless there is some untapped source of highly skilled teachers with subject area expertise, small class sizes means that a lot of kids get a teacher who can most generously be described as "adequate."  

    Preschool is a different animal altogether, and I loved the tiny classes my kids attended.  Warm, loving and attentive with lots of opportunity for creative play, physical activity, music, books and art.  

  • I dunno (0 / 0)

    I think kids need to be taught proper socialization. Otherwise some of the worst qualities and tendencies are rewarded in an unsupervised environment. Kids don't shun other kids for wholly rational or "good" reasons-- my 4 year old kid was ridiculed by other kids for bringing red pepper slices in his lunch, so now it's cukes, carrots, or nothing. If we leave the development of a preschooler too much in the hands of other preschoolers? I shudder.

Permalink | 11 comments