Mother Talkers

Childhood Obesity Revisited

Wed Dec 12, 2007 at 02:07:03 PM PDT

The other day, my kids reminded me of the dessert policy I instituted when they were young. They could choose to either have: 2 small items, like two cookies, or 8 M&M’s. Don’t ask me how I came up with this crazy formula. But I do remember firmly adhering to it and except on special occasions they knew never to even ask for special dispensation.

When they were too young to know any differently, there were no sweets or junk food in our house, at least not for them. As they got old enough to know better, I declared that complete abstinence would create cookie monsters, so “that food” became permissible but only in a natural, controlled rhythm. I do admit to sometimes finding empty candy wrappers and chip bags under couch cushions and under beds, but I allowed these digressions to pass without confrontation. I attributed it to youthful spunkiness and small acts of rebellion - allowing the guilty parties to believe that they had gotten away with something. Instead, maybe it should have been my wake up call.

By the time my kids became adolescents, they could easily have been labeled “chunky”, or “full”, or dare I say, overweight? Although I knew they weren’t skinny, they were very active, avidly playing all kinds of sports and most importantly, they had great self esteem, lots of friends and definitely no body image issues. Today, when I look back at their pictures they were definitely “overweight”. Back then I grappled with how to deal with the problem. Or was it a problem? They were far from obese, lead busy, active lives and quite honestly were very happy. The last thing that I wanted for my kids to believe was that their size mattered. Who's problem was it really?

So we framed it with discussions about eating healthy and the importance of being fit. We always had healthy meals and rarely ate fast food. Removing the sweets and chips from our cupboards was not the answer. I believed that teaching my kids how to eat in moderation and to enjoy food - every type - was a life skill they needed to learn. Removing temptations, instead of learning how to manage them, is no way to enjoy life. Perhaps this approach was a leap of faith, and either it worked or they just grew out of it. As they passed through adolescence, they eventually shed their extra weight.

But how would have I felt if their pediatrician actually labeled them “fat” to their faces at their annual physicals? I am positive I would not have welcomed this harsh reality check. Not only would I have been insulted, I never would have condoned such callous and insensitive behavior from our pediatrician. The American Medical Association has recently proposed such a recommendation:
"We need to describe this in medical terms, which is 'obesity.' When we talk to an individual family, we can be a little more cognizant of their feelings and more gentle, but that doesn't mean we can't discuss it," Washington said. "The evidence is clear that we need to bring it up."

In our ambitious attempt to confront these important issues, physicians still need to be mindful of the power in which they are vested. All adults, for that matter, cannot underestimate the potential damage their words can cause. Stigmatization can do as much harm to children as their overweight bodies. All my kids are average weights now. But they each have gone through different weight phases in their short lives. Had there been intervention by a teacher, a physician or even the government it may very well have had a detrimental affect on them. Who is to say what the best practice is?

It is crucial that we act on the obesity epidemic in our country. However, this call for action needs to be balanced ever so carefully with our responsibility to protect our young people from living a lifetime of never feeling good enough unless they are a size 2 or flaunt a sculptured body of muscle and fine lines. It’s a balancing act on a tightrope that requires master skills to gently make the way unfailingly across that wire or we risk raising an entire population of unhealthy as well as unhappy adults.

Children deserve time to be kids and to not feel like failures because they are overweight - especially when it’s not their fault. Parents, media, schools, economics and social factors are what is responsible for who they are and who they will become. They deserve to be healthy and to have a chance at living happy, normal, productive and fulfilling lives. Fixing the obesity problem in America is far more challenging than we may even begin to imagine.

Tags: Childhood Obesity, parenting, overweight (all tags)

Permalink | 13 comments

  • As the mother of a frankly overweight 8 year old (0 / 0)

    girl who right now still LOVEESSS her self to pieces I say "thank you thank you thankyou' for this.  AndI think i fell a little bit in love with you today for this post.  ;-)

    parenting an overweight child is hard. and I walk that tricky balance every day amidst comments IRL and on the net from mothers who offhandedly post on this topic and include comments (not ill-intended i know) like 'I'm fortunate my daughters not fat" or "I'm not sure what I'd do with a fat child, fortunately we're all skinny in our family"  I've yet to see someone come on and say "yeah. we're fat. we love food."  :-)  Even hearing one mom at Liza's dance studio say to another mom about her newborn chubbiness "well fortunately babies grow out of that"  I looked up and said "Liza didn't"  you would have thought I had said my child was n ax murder.  

    this is a HARD topic to navigate when you live it. thank you for this balanced and thoughtful post.
    Katie

  • sad story (0 / 0)

    A horrible story about a thoughtless doc: my friend took her suix year old to her annual check up, and the doctor said, in front of the girl, that she needed to bring her daughter back in for a weight consultation as her daughter was overweight. First, I've seen and know her daughter, and this child is NOT chubby in the least. Maybe her bones are made of lead or something, because she's honestly little. Second, this really upset the girl--as soon as they left the office, she asked her mom what overweight meant and whether this meant she was bad. Horrors!!! My friend was so upset. But she took her daughter in to the follow up appointment. Lo and behold, her daughter had lost a half a pound and was no longer overweight. How dumb is that. I hope that poor girl isn't scarred because of that thoughtless doc. There definitely needs to be a better approach.

  • Response to both of you (0 / 0)

    I really believe this is an important discussion and as moms and women we really need to be cognizant of the potential harm this can cause. Bottom line is we love our kids and we want - we need - for them to be healthy - but I agree that physicians and our culture may overreact with this obsession to be thin. I have 3 daughters (2 teens and a tween) and a son - and trust me, "self image" is not lost in our house! However, we try, really try, to talk about healthy eating and feeling good - not about how you look to others. The reality is, however, that overweight kids do get stigmatized by their peers - another study has shown that overweight kids miss more school - not because of illness but because of bullying and other social issues. So where do we begin? I'm not sure what the answers are because we are also facing an obesity epidemic. I posted earlier this week about this issue and may be worth a read.

    To Katie: Congrats on keeping the right attitude regarding your daughter. The MOST important thing is that she LOVES herself -- THE most important - and the second most important thing is that you teach her how to have a healthy diet and the importance of exercise. The rest.... is frankly, the rest.... I believe that a big problem with overweight kids is their lack self esteem and it snowballs from there . If an overweight kid feels really good about themselves, they will not allow themselves to be bullied, they will get positive feedback from kids and society in general, will have friends... and will not eat themselves into a junk food oblivion. We can't let our kids be sucked into our obsession with "thinness".

    to Minnmom - I am not surprised by your story but I am still horrified.  I have a similar one, only from the opposite angle (a too thin child) and the way her head was messed with - doctors MUST be called on their mistakes or even their comments, and as patients we have a duty to question them, challenge them if necessary and most importantly advocate for ourselves and our kids. My husband is a doctor and he advocates for this this approach to patients all the time. I too hope this poor child hasn't been scarred as well.

    Leslie www.minivan-diaries.blogspot.com

    by Leslie on Thu Dec 13, 2007 at 07:44:28 AM PDT

  • Maybe the right way for a doc to say it (0 / 0)

    is to make a routine part of EVERY exam, regardless of weight, something like:

    - what was your day like yesterday?
    - What's the most strenuous exercise you did this week?
    - What did you have for dinner last night (or lunch?)

    These are open-ended, non threatening questions that can help a doctor gauge if the kid is sitting on the couch eating french fries for every meal, or if the habits look good and there might be something else up.

  • sensitivity and accuracy (0 / 0)

    I agree that it is very important for a physician to be sensitive to self esteem.  A pediatrician should be thoroughly trained in childhood and adolescent body issues.

    But at the same time, it is not appropriate for a doctor to brush aside legitimate health issues and simply hope for the best. Remember "adult onset" diabetes?  It wasn't a disease of childhood in generations past, but now we've had to change the name to type II.  Life expectancy of these children is sharply reduced.  It's much too serious to ignore, even if that means the doctor's judgement may add to self esteem issues.

    Some (not all) overweight children have increased health risks.  One early checkup won't determine this; the doctor must monitor over time and determine whether action is needed for an individual case.  If so, I'm not sure how a doctor can help without mentioning weight.  It's important to know how best to do this, but avoiding the issue may border on malpractice.

    Parents, media, schools, economics and social factors are what is responsible for who they are and who they will become.

    Yes.  The doctors' role is more narrowly defined, and they must play this role nonjudgmentally.  Stigmatization, sadly, will be accomplished without any help from the doctor.  If preventative health can prevent or minimize this, the doctor will have played a positive role.

  • filzkorper, acctually, (0 / 0)

    the lifespan for kids is not decreasing. From Junk Food Science
    "

    The big news: Our life expectancy has hit another record high. We are living longer than at anytime in the history of our country. Babies born in 2004 can expect to live 75.2 years if male and 80.4 if female.

    In contrast, Babyboomers born in 1950 had a life expectancy of 65.5 and 71 years, respectively. And our grandparents born in 1900 had a life expectancy of a mere 48 and 51 years, respectively.

    "

    The BMI and all were created by insurance companies,not doctors and are not a good indication of health. Here is a little slide show to prove how wacked the BMI is.

    When I was 16 I was on the basket ball team and the volley ball team. My measurements were 36-24-36 and I am 5'4" I weighed 160. I wanted to go on an Outward bound trip but they told me I couldn't go unless I weighed 130. For six months I ate less than 1000 calories a day and exercised for three hours everyday. I wanted to go white water rafting and climbing so bad that I spent a month on liquid diet of 700 calories, under supervision by my doctor. I didn't loose any weight.

    My mother to this day thinks of herself as the big girl but she was 127lbs before her first child was born. I now have two very skinny boys and a chub of a two year old girl. She is 43 pounds already and the doctors have started in on me. This child eats, she eats veggies and cheese and fruit and meat and new things she has never tried, her brothers eat some version of bread and cheese and that is about it. She is active and dances most of the time and walks a minimum of a half mile a day taking her brothers to school.

    • lifespan (0 / 0)

      I don't have time to dig out the data sources but it's clear; the longevity stats have begun to trend down.  We're still well above 1950s levels though - antibiotics were just being introduced back then - and I think the trend was upward through the 90s.  But I wasn't referring to total longevity (which is slightly down, not sharply down) - I was referring specifically to kids with type II diabetes. Very sad.

      Agree on BMI though - it's a rough rule of thumb at best, and at worst the cutoff scores are probably set wrong.  It's only real advantage is that it's super easy, which is why it is used.  There's been a lot of talk about adjusting the thresh holds for overweight and obese to better reflect reality, though no one's quite sure exactly how much - reality appears to be a bit unstable depending on how you look at it.  But certainly the lower end of "overweight" is perfectly healthy, and the lower end of "normal" is probably less than ideal from a health perspective.

      There's no way that outward bound coach should have done that to you - that's horrible, abusive, and completely unjustifiable.

    • So I'm not the only one... (0 / 0)

      that reads "Junk Food Science"! I must admit to looking much more critically at the media tendency to hype up the "overweight kids" phenomenon since reading her research. But I do also wonder why she's so very determined that there isn't anything at all wrong with being overweight. Maybe I'm just a product of media management though...

      Mum to DD, born 6/04 and DS, born 4/06, and no more!

      by aussieyank on Thu Dec 13, 2007 at 11:09:33 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  • Thank-you (0 / 0)

    Thank-you for introducing me to junkfoodscience as well. I have had a chance to look at it briefly and will return when I have more time. I am always one to question the media's spin on issues - but in this case, some of those #'s in the studies I have reported on can't be refuted.  Although I haven't read the complete report that she refers to -- anyone can take ANY statistics and make them work for a point they are trying to make. The simple fact that the # of obese kids has risen and the scientific research that recently has shown the increased potential in heart disease in these kids when they become adults -- can't just be ignored. I am not sure how she finds that 98% of all kids in the US are healthy - either "healthy" is being defined with a low threshold or some #'s are being played with. It would be nice to believe that statistic, but I just can't.

    Leslie www.minivan-diaries.blogspot.com

    by Leslie on Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 11:52:37 AM PDT

  • lies, damn lies and statistics.... (0 / 0)

    Where are the numbers for the rise of obese kids coming from?

    There is so much more to it all than just weight and making it just about the fat is causing more harm than good (in my huburist opinion of course.) Why else are more boys developing anorexia?http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=85415

    I am sure I have more to say, but I can't quite reach that part of my brain at the moment. More later.

  • Here's the site (0 / 0)

    The New England Journal Medicine recently published two studies:
    http://content.nejm.org/... and
    http://content.nejm.org/...

    I think the prevalence of anorexia in boys is not surprising - there are so many social factors and pressures on these kids these days... why should boys be exempt from this disease? But the prevalence of anorexia is a separate issue than obesity -- causes are different - not sure you can compare them.

    Great discussion...

    Leslie www.minivan-diaries.blogspot.com

    by Leslie on Fri Dec 14, 2007 at 05:22:29 PM PDT

  • Ok here is another quote (0 / 0)

    From  TCS daily

    Two different analyses from the Growing Up Today Study (GUTS), based at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston, were released last month. GUTS is a databank of questionnaires about diet, lifestyle habits and health that were gathered from more than 16,000 children, 9 to 14 years of age. Their mothers are from the Nurses Health Study, the huge database of questionnaires gathered since 1976 from over 120,000 nurses. The study has the limitations inherent in population studies, but what makes these two studies from GUTS significant is that the researchers couldn't even find a connection between soda or snack (ice cream, candy, chips, sweet baked goods, etc.) consumption and weight among these kids after 3 years. In other words, fat children weren't eating more sweets than thin children.

    It goes onto say that the kids who were fat were the ones who had been on diets in the past.

    And regardless of their diets, children will still naturally grow up to be a wide range of heights and body weights. "Multiple researchers, using a variety of methodologies, have failed to find any meaningful or replicable differences in the caloric intake or eating patterns of the obese compared to the non-obese to explain obesity," concluded David Garner, Ph.D. and Susan Wooley, Ph.D., for example, in their review of some 500 studies on weight in Clinical Psychology Review.

    So perhaps the societal need to be thin in order to be beautiful and healthy is part of what is causing kids to become obese in the first place as opposed to being big individuals at a natural healthy set point of weight.

    As a parent  I am working on teaching that people come in all sizes and that is no indication of their morals or worth or even physical health.

  • more info (0 / 0)

    30 years ago when I was in high school the girls were all obsessed with diets.  In the 1 950s my mom took up smoking to stay thin, and often told me she'd rather die of cancer than gain weight.  (She got her wish.)  Our desire to be thin is nothing new.  But the alarming rate of weight gain in our population is new.  

    You cannot look at this without seeing that something dramatic is going on, and it's happening amazingly fast:
    http://www.cdc.gov/...

    Something is happening.  Nobody knows why.

    mom to DS1, 7 yr old frat boy, and DS2, 5 yr old engineer

    by lyn on Mon Dec 17, 2007 at 04:48:47 PM PDT

Permalink | 13 comments