View Story | 32 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
It is now abundantly clear that food-to-fuel mandates are leading to increased environmental damage. First, producing ethanol requires huge amounts of energy -- most of which comes from coal. Second, the production process creates a number of hazardous byproducts, and some production facilities are reportedly dumping these in local water sources. Third, food-to-fuel mandates are helping drive up the price of agricultural staples, leading to significant changes in land use with major environmental harm. Here in the United States, farmers are pulling land out of the federal conservation program, threatening fragile habitats.
It is now abundantly clear that food-to-fuel mandates are leading to increased environmental damage. First, producing ethanol requires huge amounts of energy -- most of which comes from coal. Second, the production process creates a number of hazardous byproducts, and some production facilities are reportedly dumping these in local water sources.
Third, food-to-fuel mandates are helping drive up the price of agricultural staples, leading to significant changes in land use with major environmental harm. Here in the United States, farmers are pulling land out of the federal conservation program, threatening fragile habitats.
This is from a good summary article in the Washington Post that outlines the failure of ethanol on multiple fronts. You might have to register (free) to read it.
The whole thing makes me so furious. Is there anything Bush can't ruin for us??
by happy clam on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 05:48:14 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
View Story | 32 comments