View Story | 94 comments
Comments: Expand Shrink Hide (Always) | Indented Flat (Always)
There are so many possible factors that could be causing/contributing to autism, but so many people are fixated on vaccines that it just will not die. No matter how much evidence you present, people come back with, "with my child I know it was the vaccine." End of argument. And really, why would you argue with a grieving parent?
Many people are expecting more data on vaccines, but at this point I think the epidemiologic studies are more or less done (though data may still be coming in on long term projects). I don't think there are any study designs left that would be larger or stronger than studying, say, the entire population of a country over a decade, in which many people decline vaccines and every child has excellent and well tracked health care. (This one is Denmark, FYI. There are many others, including a Japanese study of similar magnitude.) Removing thymerasol from vaccines has done exactly nothing to the autism rate anywhere in the world.
by lyn on Fri Feb 29, 2008 at 08:54:37 AM PDT
[ Parent ]
From what I've read, the Denmark study seemed to be the clincher on the whole debate. And wasn't there some guy in England who started this whole debate and even he has rescinded his opinions?
And don't the symptoms of autism start to really show up around 18 months, or that's where typical children and children with autism start to diverge in behavior and development, which also happens to be when the final series of shots are given?
No point in arguing with a grieving parent though, I agree with you on that.
by NJmom on Fri Feb 29, 2008 at 08:58:15 AM PDT
starkly at 18 - 24 months, sometimes there are signs much earlier (e.g., posture, social interest). But you can see how a parent would find that correlation suspicious, if they had their child vaccinated on schedule.
by mamacita on Fri Feb 29, 2008 at 09:00:54 AM PDT
There's a great biblical quote about grieving people:
"the words of one in despair belong to the wind." Job 8:2
I feel for the parents, as one who has experienced great despair in my own parenting journey. But we can't let the 'words of people in despair' dictate the tone of public debate, or worse, set public policy.
by sangfroid on Fri Feb 29, 2008 at 12:18:23 PM PDT
is that 'cause' is a close cousin of 'blame'. People desperately want to uncover any causes of autism we can control in the hopes of keeping our children safer. Yet no one can bear the thought that their child's autism is in any way their fault.
But what happens if we actually do discover that autism is caused by tylenol, or McDonald's french fries, or TV? Or anything else that a child receives from a loving parent? Parents will agonize over every fry they let their baby gnaw on, every episode of Sesame Street they turned on, every low fever they didn't leave alone. Some parents would accept that they couldn't have known, but for others the knowledge that they were the one to expose their child would be devastating.
And so some theories are more strongly resisted than others, because there is a strong need to believe that it must be something like vaccines, viruses, air pollution, or groundwater contamination. A cause we can fight to improve without taking blame ourselves for the exposure.
by lyn on Fri Feb 29, 2008 at 01:31:31 PM PDT
this certainly don't help.
by TeachPeace on Fri Feb 29, 2008 at 08:20:22 PM PDT
View Story | 94 comments